Nov 24, 2023
This episode is one to listen to and treasure - and certainly bookmark to share with colleagues now and in the future. No matter where you are on your journey with using generative AI in education, there's something in this episode for you to apply in the classroom or leading others in the use of AI.
There are many people to thank for making this episode possible, including the extraordinary guests:
Matt Esterman - Director of Innovation &
Partnerships at Our Lady of Mercy College Parramatta. An
educational leader who's making things happen with AI in education
in Australia, Matt created and ran the conference where these
interviews happened. He emphasises the importance of passionate
educators coming together to improve education for students. He
shares his main takeaways from the conference and the need to
rethink educational practices for the success of students.
Follow Matt on Twitter and LinkedIn
Roshan Da Silva - Dean of Digital Learning and
Innovation at The King's School - shares his experience of
using AI in both administration and teaching. He discusses the
evolution of AI in education and how it has advanced from simple
question-response interactions to more sophisticated prompts and
research assistance. Roshan emphasises the importance of teaching
students how to use AI effectively and proper sourcing of
information.
Follow Roshan on Twitter
Siobhan James - Teacher Librarian at Epping
Boys High School - introduces her journey of exploring AI in
education. She shares her personal experimentation with AI tools
and services, striving to find innovative ways to engage students
and enhance learning. Siobhan shares her excitement about the
potential of AI beyond traditional written subjects and its
application in other areas.
Follow Siobhan on LinkedIn
Mark Liddell - Head of Learning and Innovation
from St Luke's Grammar School - highlights the importance of
supporting teachers on their AI journey. He explains the need to
differentiate learning opportunities for teachers and address their
fears and misconceptions. Mark shares his insights on personalised
education, assessment, and the role AI can play in enhancing
both.
Follow Mark on Twitter and LinkedIn
Anthony England - Director of Innovative
Learning Technologies at Pymble Ladies College - discusses his
extensive experimentation with AI in education. He emphasises the
need to challenge traditional assessments and embrace AI's ability
to provide valuable feedback and support students' growth and
mastery. Anthony also explains the importance of inspiring
curiosity and passion in students, rather than focusing solely on
grades. And we're not sure which is our favourite quote from
the interviews, but Anthony's "Haters gonna hate, cheater's gonna
cheat" is up there with his "Pushing students into beige"
Follow Anthony on Twitter and LinkedIn
Special thanks to Jo Dunbar and the team at Western Sydney University's Education Knowledge Network who hosted the conference, and provided Dan and I with a special space to create our temporary podcast studio for the day
________________________________________
TRANSCRIPT For this episode of The AI in Education Podcast
Series: 7
Episode: 4
This transcript was auto-generated. If you spot any important errors, do feel free to email the podcast hosts for corrections.
Welcome to the AI and education podcast. Now, we've got
something pretty special for you over the next three episodes cuz
we're going to hear from a group of really smart people. So, that's
not you and I, Dan. There were a great group of people at the AI
education conference that was the run and created by Matt Estim.
and hosted by the education team at Western Sydney University. It
was a such a high energy event. I had about 130 teachers, education
leaders spending all the day hearing about and talking about the
pedagogical aspects of AI in education. So they talked about the
educational implications. They didn't really spend that much time
talking about all the twists and turns in technology that we were
talking about in last week's podcast. It was more about what would
happen in the classroom.
Yeah. Absolutely. So I think our listeners should settle in because
I think we're going to bring a lot of the series together in some
shorter interviews from different schools in this episode. So next
week we'll have a longer interview with a brains behind the
conference Mr. Matt Estman himself. But this week we're going to
really hear from several of the speakers from K12 and the week
after I think Ray we're going to put some bits together around
higher education as well. We've got a lot to get through today.
Let's crack it.
Yeah, lots of voices to hear. here from schools. So we've got
Anthony England from Pimble Ladies College, Siobhan James from
Eping uh Boys High School, Roshanda Silva from King School, Mark
Liddell from St. Luke's. But Dan, we should start with the man in
the moment, the conference convenor extraordinaire Matt Estman from
Our Lady of Mercy College.
Hi Matt, welcome to the podcast today. How you doing?
Yeah, really well, thanks. Really well.
What an amazing event. It's been so good and we've had so many
great people from different areas represented different uh parts to
the sector. What were your main takeaways? Cuz you were in a lot of
the panels and everything.
Yeah. Oh, look, main takeaways are when you get a bunch of
interested, passionate people together, then you can talk about
pretty much anything, go anywhere, but everyone's here for the same
purpose, which is to just do better by our kids. And just because
today was themed on AI, I think a lot of the the conversation came
back to success for students and working with young people and
rethinking what we're doing for them. So, yeah, I was I walked away
really inspired, been great.
Did Did you learn anything new. I'm sure there's lots of things,
right?
Yeah. I guess perspectives like what we talked about earlier, you
know, that idea of hearing from people in say primary or higher
education and what they're thinking about because I guess my echo
chamber is secondary education and Australian secondary education.
So, it was really good to hear from other states and from those
other sectors as well. Yeah.
I I thought it was also interesting picking up on the variation in
adoption. So, we we had some people that were all in like you or
all in. And then other people that even though this is an AI and
education conference, they didn't really use it that much.
It was very new to them and they were in sponge mode. They were
just absorbing what other people were doing.
And then in some of the conversations then people were very
cautious about what their colleagues might think. You know, they
were happy using chat GPT to do things but they knew that their
colleagues wouldn't be. And that kind of human aspect of the change
came out a lot for me
and I think a lot of people worried about things perhaps about
perceptions rather than reality as well. People worried about what
their boss might think or worried about what systems might think
whereas actually they don't think about it yet and whether people
are using it on their personal devices to test things out and
really explore but then in their work world having to be very very
cautious or applying a self-perception that they have to be
cautious whereas actually if they turned around to the person next
to them and said hey here's something I tried their minds would be
and they and they'd be have a really cool conversation about that.
So, it's interesting. Yeah.
And also I picked up on people saying, "Oh, wouldn't it be good if
the department did this for us?" So, things like report writing,
you know, there was obviously a demand to have have their lives
made easier, but looking above them for organizations to to take
that pain away.
But I don't think we've ever had something that was individually
driven
recently than this because most learning technologies or
technologies in schools are are given to you, right? Like you're
given a device, you're given a room that has particular equipment
or whatever, given particular software to apply. This it you can be
at any school in any context doing any job and pick up your own
smartphone and just try some stuff that relates to that job, but
nobody at work needs to know about. So, it's a totally different
environment we're working in.
Yeah. Well, this this been phenomenal today and this podcast
episode is a testament to your uh you know, tenacity to bring all
these people together because I think if we read We want to change
and I do think Australia does have the opportunity to do it. As I
was saying to you earlier, I think we big enough that we can make a
difference and an impact, but small enough that and agile enough
and smart enough that we can actually do it.
Wow, Dan. Small enough, agile enough, smart enough. Hey Dan, two
out of three isn't bad. Matt's extraordinarily wise, isn't he Dan?
I saw that at the conference and there's a lot more to come in the
fulllength interview next week. But who else did he speak to?
Well, let me introduce you next. Rashandanda Silva from the King
School. He started to use AI in his work from an admin side and a
teaching side. And like Matt, he's from a humanities and he's a
history teacher. So let's roll the VT.
Hi Rashan from the King School. How are you doing today?
I'm very good, thank Dan. Thank you very much.
So in your kind of background in education and technology, this AI,
what are your thoughts on it?
Look, it was quite exciting right when it first came about because
obviously this process has has actually been around a long time but
it obviously allowed people like a ordinary classroom teacher and a
student for example you put put in some information and get some
information back. At the start it was a bit bit fraught I guess in
the education sense because obviously students were using it for a
number of different reasons mostly just to put in a question and
get an answer back that they would submit as their own work. I
think staff and students have become a lot clever in the use of it
especially in terms of writing prompts now and I think a lot of
schools are teaching students how to write proper prompt
so they can Yeah. So they can actually get a a much much better
response in return and then take that information and edit it edit
it for their own.
Have you had to do lots of staff training around that? Is there a
bit of a gap appearing?
Look, there is a huge gap and I think teachers are a little bit
still concerned about the use of AI. I still think there's this
whole idea of catching students out and I don't think that's that's
what we should be looking at. It's actually helping them use the
tool like a a computer or or a calculator came out a long time
ago.
Yeah,
we've been using those tools for a long time. So This is just the
next step.
Yeah. Well, what excites you most? Have you used any of the tools
out there? What kind of ones capture your imagination the most or
have you seen teachers using in the classroom?
Yeah, I can split that answer into two actually. So, probably in in
my area where we're lighting writing a lot of policies and huge
documentation where we're actually reading large amounts of PDFs
that are sometimes 195 pages long.
Yeah.
Yeah. So, that takes time, right? The whole speed and and
processing power of the of the AI tools of of summarizing
information for us quickly and then for us to reuse that
information in a meaningful way. That saved us a lot of time, which
has made us a lot more productive in terms of writing policies and
procedures. I'm a history teacher by trade. So, we would now start
the process of saying to students, let's put this question in and
see what the AI spits out.
Yeah.
And let's look at the sources that we can use to either prove or
disprove some of this information.
And that's interesting from a history point of view. I know Matt
Estman, he's a history teacher by Chad and geography teacher and
he's done quite a lot of interest in historical references and uses
of G technology which is quite cool but then also on the other side
of it I think science and history are one of the subjects that do a
lot their own sources
correct
so what would your thoughts be then if students are using work from
GPT and and other technology similar to that using AI what's the
best way to source things like that look I think sourcing is is a
difficult thing right I think what AI is actually doing is giving
students a starting point so we all know that not every student is
is equal in terms with their understanding and the way they're able
to formulate an answer.
Yeah.
So, I would say the whole AI process is providing students who
aren't as gifted or talented with an opportunity to start the whole
process at a point and that's making a lot easier for for boys and
girls, I guess, to formulate an answer because they they're being
provided with a prompt and then they can go away and check that
prompt that's linking into their research skills and not just
history, that's linked into any subject and then proving or
disproving that. answers. So I think the whole idea that AI is a
tool for cheating I think has now moved because we're now realizing
that actually it's speeding up our whole work process students
staff at the same time.
Yeah, absolutely. That's such a thoughtful and mature way to be
thinking about this. I hope lots of teachers are listening into to
that cuz that's that's a wonderful way to think about it. Thanks
Rashan.
Thank you for having me. Take care.
Wow. It's been interesting to hear the perspectives of people who
are on the journey and doing their experimentation. Now it's not
People like you and I, Dan. Few. We live and breathe technology and
AI every day. But I love hearing from people like Matt and Rashan
who are primarily teachers and they're taking the pragmatic
approach of this just another tool in my teaching toolkit.
Yeah. And and like every tool, you have to learn how to use it. So
next we've got Siobhan from Eping Boys. She's going to talk about a
voyage of discovery about using AI, finding AI, and the different
apps and services that she's tried. in the classroom and with her
teachers. It's really fascinating to listen to what she's learned
on the way.
Hi Siobhan, how are you?
Good. How are you Dan?
I'm very well, thanks. So from Epin Boy School,
I started last year.
Awesome.
So I was teaching and then I moved to the teacher librarian role
this year.
You do so many things in that role. What what's kind of capturing
your attention at the minute around this generative AI
conversation?
Probably the apprehension mostly like how a lot of people feel that
it's this new scary thing and the actual potential of what it can
do.
Do are you getting any PD or professional development around this
area at all or you just got to find it all yourself?
Find it all yourself. Basically, this has been like a little pet
project of mine since end of last year when chat GPT kind of
started to be released to the public.
Yeah. What kind of things have you been doing with it in your
school?
Well, I've been playing around to see I'm trying to test it to its
limits. So, for me, um, if it can't write a whole response, I'll
see how well it can mimic my own writing style.
Wow.
So, I've been having fun playing around with that.
Yeah.
And like following a lot of different social media platforms to see
how they've been testing and playing with the technology. So, some
people have been using it to write
what's called VBA code to
craft PowerPoint presentations with pre-filled information, playing
around with your voice. There's a few different AIs which you can
train it for about 10 minutes and then can record dialogue in your
style. Yeah.
And in your voice.
Wow. Wow. That's fantastic, isn't it?
Yeah.
The technology is moving very, very quickly. Yeah.
Are are any of the teachers in your school utilizing anything
specifically? Have you got any examples of what some of the
teachers have been doing?
Not really. It's mainly been me playing around with it and then
having casual conversations with other teachers to see what they
want to use it for.
Yeah.
But basically, next year there's going to be a bigger push for how
we're going to deal with AI as a whole school, especially with the
department. I believe it was announced recently. that they're going
to be not blocking chat GBT from school servers because other
schools have it freely available but department schools don't.
Yeah. Okay, that's interesting. And are there any other tools that
you might have been using in the classroom and in school which
you've been playing with that that have been quite uh fun? Have you
done any image stuff?
I've been playing around with the image stuff myself just for fun
and I've been using it to like I've been using it for mainly my own
practice. Yeah.
I haven't had the I've had conversations with other students doing
like individual research projects on how to best utilize it and be
being aware of the limitations that AI has.
Um, but I haven't had the chance to execute it officially in full
school lessons yet because we're still trying to learn how we're
going to deal with it as a school as well as in general.
I I find the the teacher librarians, especially in New South Wales
where I reside, there's a lot of innovation that comes out to the
teacher librarian side. When STEM became popular, teacher
librarians are running the STEM programs in schools. So, it's great
to see that you're bringing that generative AI stuff together. Is
there something that you're looking forward to learning more about
is there kind of areas that you're interested in?
Probably seeing how it's applied in other subjects because a lot of
the time most people think with AI, oh, it's specifically for the
written subjects. It's usually, oh, it's how are we using it in the
English classroom, the history classroom. I'm curious to see how it
can be used for other subject areas that may not necessarily be
based in writing.
Yes.
Cuz writing is the biggest obvious But of course with Midjourney
and Darly and all those visual AI stuff, it'd be interesting to see
how students could adapt and use those kinds of image technology AI
within their own individual projects.
Yeah, definitely. I've seen some great stuff in some schools I've
been in recently where even some of the English teachers have been
showing images and getting kids to reverse engineer Yes.
using English the prompts back to try to copy the image. It's like
been fantastic. So thanks again Siobhan.
Thank you. That was fascinating. I love the freedom to experiment
that Siobhan obviously feels like that's something I talk about all
the time. I ask the question, have you used it? What tasks have you
given it? And then I talk about the wide range of tasks that I've
used it for because let's be honest, we don't really know what it's
capable of, do we then?
No. True.
And that's what I found interesting when you were talking with Mark
Liddell from Salut's Grammar School. I listened to that and we went
from learning about the technology to learning about the
application of it with teachers and some really re really really
good insights in the in this interview about the different
approaches and different staff attitudes.
Hi Mark, how are you
Dan? Great to see you today.
Yeah, you too. Thanks for joining us on this podcast episode. We at
the AI education event obviously. What have we find this morning so
far?
It's been wonderful. So it's been great to be able to hear some
different perspectives on how is it that AI can have an impact?
What's been happening so far and then looking at where are we
headed? What are some of the ways that we can help for our teachers
and for our students to get prepared for these next steps within
AI?
Yeah. And what are you currently doing at the minute at your
school?
So, right now we're just asking lots of questions. So, we have been
able to provide some optin AI professional learning sessions for
our teachers. We've been able to develop a student learning
continuum and a teacher learning continuum and Now we're looking at
our next few years of being able to say right in what ways do we
want to differentiate the way that we'll support teachers. We've
also got innovators within the school who we're working closely
with. So right now working with this really wonderful math teacher
and he's asking the question how is it that I can help to improve
the behavior, the effort and the meaning of each lesson for my
students? And it turns out the way he's been solving those
different problems is by AI writing code that's developed a
dashboard for him that's bringing together effort academic progress
and disposition reflection. So it's just been really fun to go on
that journey with this particular teacher.
And isn't it interestingly from technology I know you've got a rich
history of technology and innovation in your in your background but
one thing that's jumped out to me is there's a couple of maths
lecturers here today. Mathematics education has been something that
often technology
has kind of left behind and other other subjects picked it up more.
So that's fantastic to hear the maths department's picked this
up.
Yeah. Yeah. Well, it's a matter of saying we've got our math
curriculum, right? And we're doing quadratic equations. Okay. We we
can't really shift a whole lot within that if we're learning
quadratics.
However, we get to set this up for our learners. We get to provide
the landscape of how it's going to apply. We also get to describe
to students what does success look like? And we would want to say
that Success doesn't just look like I can understand quadratic
equations and solve them. We also want to articulate and say, wait
a second, your ability to persevere, your ability to develop
reasoning, your ability to collaborate, all of these things are
part of that success criteria. So if all you can do by the end of
the lesson is solve for two values for X, we haven't done our job
properly. Like there's a whole lot more to regular classroom
learning than just ticking that curriculum. box. That That's
phenomenal, isn't it? Did you learn anything specific from today? I
I know the one of the quotes that jumped out to me was around the
beehive.
Yeah. Right. So, that quote that you're referring to there was just
saying that the purpose of the beehive is not to produce honey.
It's that these bees are constructing this healthy hive and it
turns out a byproduct of that is this honey. And so, I guess the
thing that's jumped out for me in today's session is that we're all
come together around AI. But really most of the conversation has
been about hi which is human intelligence or AI like emotional
intelligence that actually will go alongside that AI work. So I
feel as though we shouldn't really be just coming together to
discuss AI. We should be looking at the whole person the whole
student and saying right we already know all of these things are
required for our students to be successful in the long run and now
we've just got this additional tool. I I feel that for some exper
experienced teachers. Uh for some teachers that aren't that
interchange, just having that conversation always about AI is
actually going to repel them. And if we start using more holistic
language where we are talking about the relational growth of our
students, we are talking about the the growth in reasoning of our
students. And then alongside that, we've got these other tools that
help to refine some of the learning process of our students. I
think that's going to allow for better buying for some of different
teachers that will be able to say, "Wait a second, I can support my
student with their academic learning and also with the tools that
will support them with revision that might connect with AI."
That's that's such a good way to look at it. When you reflect
yourself on where things are going with AI now,
what what do you see is coming next, which you excited about? And
then also, how are you managing that digital divide in in your
school? Is everybody on the same page or are varying different uh
degrees of staff PD happening? Sure. So where are we headed next?
So firstly, we're headed into a very exciting time because when it
is that staff are equipped to understand and use AI well, it does
amplify the progress for our students. It helps them to be able to
see just like we've had with other technologies. How is it that I
can harness this for good use? So I'm reading and I'm listening and
I'm getting involved with lots of different conversations which is
helping me to know that whatever those different problems are,
we're going to solve them alongside students to make school a
better place. So that's number one. Number two, how is it that we
best help our teachers? Well, in the same way that we differentiate
learning for our students, we have to do the same for our teachers.
And just in the last week, some of the different conversations,
some of the opportunities, some of the fears that our teachers
have, there's lots of misinformation, there's lots of
misunderstanding because it's just moving
at 190 km per second. A lot of people will say, "Right, I'm jumping
on board. This is going to be the ride of my life." Other people
are like, "I'm not even going to the station." Like, if you tell me
something now, it's going to be out of date and then I'm going to
have to listen again. So,
I think we've got to empathize well and say, what is going to
provide that entry step for this group of teachers? What's going to
provide that comfort and that kind of handholding for a different
group of teachers? Because we can't just put our heads in the sand
and think this is going away like that is not going to happen.
We need to be able to make sure that all of our different teachers
can see the possibilities. They can see the need and then to be
able to care for them well and provide those learning and
development opportunities that will help them to take their next
steps.
Well, that that's fantastic. Thanks for joining us today on the
podcast, Mark from St. Luke's. Really really appreciate it.
Thanks so much, Dan. That was fab. Hearing that really unlocked
good ideas for moving from experimentation to actually supporting
teachers on their journey. Let's be honest and between Matt,
Rashan's, Siobhan, and Mark, we've had some amazing insights to
help other school, let's call them middle leaders, the people that
are leading this and they're navigating the complexity
and the ambiguity. So, how do we bring it home, Dan? Who have you
saved for last?
Oh, we've got Anthony England from PLC. Let's roll the VT. Welcome,
Anthony England, to the podcast. studio.
Absolutely. It's a good looking studio.
It is, isn't it? How have you How have you enjoyed today?
Yeah. Good. Look, I love talking AI. I actually think I like
cruising the uncertain edge and I think that's what AI is.
Yeah, absolutely. And and I was really interested of the questions
you posed the panel discussion because it really teased out some of
the key components with with some of the some of the panelists and
the audience in terms of the things that you were doing with your
school. I I saw a LinkedIn post the other day where you It's a a
personalized tutor. You're really pushing the boundaries at the
minute, right?
Yeah. Look, I think bit like co there is no best practice with the
experiment.
And so I'm one to experiment and happy to fail, but certainly happy
to kick the tires to see what works, what doesn't, and then if I
love something, I will tell people. So I'm going to flip the
question. What hasn't worked is the old assessments.
Wow.
Because in a world where where typically what we do at the moment
is get a student to make something to prove that they've mastered
the content, the mode, and no longer be able to say with certainty
that they were the maker. I love that AI is pushing assessments to
a different place. I love that if you know what you want to say,
then you've got this savant assistant that with clear purpose you
can get it to produce something that you're happy with and it's so
polite at taking feedback when it's I'm so sorry I got of course 2
plus 2 plus 5 what was I thinking as an AI
it's so good isn't it I how are the image generation side to those
things have you seen a lot of use of that
look interesting I reckon I've learned more about art and art
criticism given an AI tool than ever before from any art theory or
museum that I went to because I love I know what I love but I need
to now know how to describe what I love to a a machine so we can
create something that is something that I value. Um so I've given
it tasks to provide feedback on user interface design. I've given
it tasks to generate logos and images that give meaning to some
concept I'm trying to convey. Uh, I've had it, you know, remove
backgrounds and generate new bits in into images really quickly. I
feel more artistic than I have since I was a 5-year-old. You know,
you don't you don't find a 5-year-old that doesn't feel like
they're an artist. But as a 50year-old, you don't find many people
who feel like they're artists. And for
first time in ages, I feel like, hey, I'm kind of being creative
visually. And for me, is exciting, playful.
Yeah. I And I I love it when teachers are playing with these things
cuz that it just boggles my mind. I saw somebody the other day
where they're a literacy teacher that was asking the teachers, you
know, what have you done? Literacy teacher created an image with
quite a complex prompt and they in the class it was about the kids
trying to copy that image with descriptive writing.
Beautiful.
Ah, it was a beautiful task. Yeah, I can't even describe how good
it was. And sometimes you see some of those lessons, you think,
wow. And the ideas the teachers come up with just keep getting
better and better and better.
Another thing I think is working well is feedback.
I think The navana of personalized education that's catered for you
as a learner was a bridge too far. But AI makes it possible. I have
got chat JP4. So I would upload a rubric, upload a handwritten
piece of work, ask it to generate some comments about that
according to the rubric how it's gone. Then got it to suggest an
improvement on what it would change. Then I got it to critique the
original and the uh revive. and identify what elements it changed
and why it could justify that paragraph by paragraph it was
providing amazing feedback to a student who's wanting to improve
their writing.
Yeah, absolutely. It's that Sal Khan two sigma problem that they
talked earlier on as well isn't it? The two things that have always
been sort of out of the grasp of teachers have been personalization
and assessment changing assessment and I think we're on a cusp of
being able to change those.
Absolutely. If you've got a grade as the motivator, you're creating
an assessment that's asking to be gained.
Yes.
Because what's the outcome? The best thing is an A and that's what
they hope for. But if it's about some intrinsically valuable thing
that they want to improve and grow in, when you speak to students,
they don't want to cheat that process. They want to improve
themsel.
And so it actually nudges assessments to look at what's
intrinsically valuable.
Yeah.
To the learner, not just grade hunting.
One thing you mentioned earlier on which I'd never heard before and
I thought it was phenomenal where you talked about pushing students
into beige.
Mhm.
And and that's really made me think today about the top end
students and the negative elements that if you are chasing that
grade we could bring down the top end. Do you want to explain to us
a bit about that beige?
Yeah. Yeah. So the idea is that you're going to compress to the
middle
that the obvious one is that the lowerend student is going to
submit work that's better than they naturally might have done
without AI. Yeah.
And so they they've gone further to the middle. On the other end,
the threat is will AI with its say with image creation, with its
amazing ability to generate pretty impressive output,
will it make those top- end students go, well, could I be bothered?
It's a lot of hard work to get the skills required to be able to
produce this. So, eh, and so they don't bother. They'll lower their
effort. and then lower their growth in the face of AI. And so the
threat is will students then all compress to the middle and
everyone just becomes beige?
Yeah.
And I think the missing piece in that question is the joy of
mastery that when you find something that you love, cooking the
perfect steak, making perfect loaf of bread, painting that sunset,
nobody wants to cheat that joy. In fact, there's a whole game
industry about those micro moments of joy of mastery that we yes I
failed last time but I got it this time and that's an addictive
gaming strategy the gamification of things those micro moments of
joy the dopamine hit that I'm on the right path I've made that next
level
that is what we're forgetting that people don't go beige people
want to improve and you talk to students today
cheaters going to cheat taylor Swift would say that you know haters
going to hate cheaters going to cheat
but the other students who don't want to cheat. They want to be
their best self.
They're worried because they don't want to be seen as shortch
changing their own growth.
Yes.
And so they're worried if I use this, am I diminishing myself and
nobody wants to do that.
And I I think that's gold. I really do. I think this definitely
you're on to something there. I mentioned something in the panel
earlier on where they were talking generally about AI and how it
was going to impact your brain function and my analogy was using
Google Maps and you forget what everything is you just follow the
sat lab these days and you don't even know where the cricket thing
is which you've been to 20 times this term but you you can't
remember where it is. So you get a cognitive amputation as Travis
Smith from Microsoft calls it. But if you are intrinsically
interested and want to master a particular thing then that doesn't
even come into play. But if there's something that's boring for the
kids it's about maybe the teachers lighting that fire and bringing
learning opportunities to the students that really want to do. So
the master is there. Yeah,
every teacher wants to light the spark of curiosity, of finding a
passion.
No one's decides, hey, I want to be a teacher because I want to
help achieve a minimum standard. Tick a box.
That's I want to be able to give people B's and A's. They want to
see people grow.
And so lighting that spark, that's what teachers want to do. That's
why we got into the game is to inspire the future generation to be
their best self. Like that's inspire Spiring to see them grow and
be better. That's what teachers love.
Absolutely. Well, thank you so much for joining us today.
Absolutely. Lovely to chat with you, Dan. Cheers. Bye.
Well, Ray, that was another excellent interview to end the podcast
today. You know, I find Anthony and some of his thoughts around
education. He thinks so deeply about the implications for his staff
and more importantly the students and the way that this technology
moves. He's always thinking ahead of the game. game and like the
Wayne Gretzky quotes about playing where the puck is going to be
just absolutely phenomenal and his thoughts on art and the way he's
developed his own thinking around this technology just blows my
mind. This podcast is going to be the one I keep coming back to and
referring other people to to get into the understanding of what
people are doing, what might happen in the future. Yes,
it's just so I mean just amazing voices that we got to hear
there.
AB: Absolutely. And I'm really looking forward to uh the next
episode where we'll look at some of these in a little bit more
detail and have some extended interviews with some of the
characters you heard from today.
Yeah, next time round it's a longer interview with Matt Estman and
just understanding and a bit more detail what he's doing and then
beyond that we've got some interviews we did we did with people
from higher education that uh will be in an episode in the
future.
Thanks everybody who actually uh took the time out to uh be on our
podcast during the event a couple of weeks ago.
Thanks Dan. See you next week.
Bye.